The Smart Investor
    Facebook Instagram
    Saturday, October 17
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    The Smart Investor
    • Home
    • About
      • About Us
      • Careers
    • Smart Investing
      • Getting Started
      • Investing Strategy
      • Smart Analysis
      • Smart Reads
    • US Stocks
    • Special Free Reports!
    • As Featured on BT
    • Our Services
      • Our Services
      • Subscribe now!
    • Login
    • Cart
    The Smart Investor
    Home»Growth Stocks»Yangzijiang vs ST Engineering: Which Singapore Growth Stock Would I Buy?
    Growth Stocks

    Yangzijiang vs ST Engineering: Which Singapore Growth Stock Would I Buy?

    Two Singapore-listed companies have very different growth stories – one benefits from global shipbuilding demand, while the other is positioned around aerospace, defence and technology. Which offers the better long-term opportunity?
    Wilson H.By Wilson H.September 4, 20266 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp
    Yangzijiang vs ST Engineering
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    Singapore’s market has a reputation for steady dividend-paying blue chips, but it also hides some genuine growth engines too. 

    Two names stand out, and they couldn’t be more different. 

    Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (SGX: BS6), or YZJ, is highly linked to global trade, shipping cycles, and vessel demand. 

    On the other hand, ST Engineering (SGX: S63), or STE, is riding long-run trends in aviation, defence and smart infrastructure.

    Here’s how they stack up.  

    Understanding the Two Businesses

    Yangzijiang Shipbuilding: Riding the Global Shipping Cycle

    Listed in Singapore, YZJ is one of China’s largest private shipbuilders. 

    It builds commercial vessels for global shipowners and leasing firms. 

    These vessels include container ships, tankers, gas carriers (for LNG and ethane), and other specialised ships. 

    How YZJ makes money is simple: Customers place orders, revenue is recognised as the vessels are built and delivered, while a fat order book provides multi-year topline visibility. 

    ST Engineering: A Global Technology and Engineering Group

    Meanwhile, STE is a Singapore-headquartered global engineering group with three business arms: commercial aerospace, which involves aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul; defence and public security; and urban solutions. 

    In other words, the company earns money from servicing aircraft, supplying defence systems, and building smart-city and digital infrastructure. 

    Crucially, this diversification of business segments means STE has a very different risk profile from a pure-play shipbuilder – STE is less likely to sink (pardon the pun) from a single cycle. 

    Growth Story #1: YZJ

    The bull case for YZJ starts with demand. The world’s shipping fleet is ageing and needs renewing. Owners also want larger and more fuel-efficient vessels, and tightening decarbonisation rules are driving orders for LNG-powered and “green” ships, which is a sweet spot for YZJ, whose order book now includes a healthy proportion of clean-energy vessels.

    The shipbuilder’s recent financials are strong: For the half-year ending 30 June 2026 (1H2026), YZJ’s topline climbed 36% year on year (YoY) to RMB17.5 billion, while net profit increased 28% YoY to RMB5.4 billion. 

    The company also posted a formidable return on equity (ROE) of 32%. 

    Importantly, shipbuilding gross margin expanded to 37% as higher-priced 2023-2024 contracts flowed through, with YZJ generating operating cash flow of RMB1.9 billion, up 64% from a year ago.

    As of 30 June 2026, YZJ’s order book stands at US$22.4 billion, consisting of 256 vessels scheduled to be delivered through to 2030, which provides roughly four years of revenue visibility. 

    YZJ sits on a net cash position of RMB12.5 billion, which provides ample headroom to manage industry cycles. 

    And these cycles can be brutal: Shipbuilding is deeply cyclical, where margins can normalise quickly, and newbuild orders and prices can pull back sharply. 

    Add the China angle and its related regulatory and economic risks, and the risk profile of YZJ has to be consistently monitored. 

    Growth Story #2: STE

    STE’s appeal to investors is durability: Its commercial aerospace arm rides a structural tailwind where aviation cargo and passenger volumes are growing, and an ageing global fleet needs ever more maintenance. 

    The defence business benefits from increased global government spending under long-term contracts, and its urban-solutions arm plugs into smart-city and digital demand. 

    In 1H2026, STE’s topline grew 11% YoY to S$6.6 billion, but operating profit grew faster, by 23% YoY, to S$738 million. 

    The order book reached S$35.7 billion as of 30 June 2026, and STE paid an interim dividend of S$0.05 per share, 25% higher than a year ago, extending a long record of stable or rising dividends. 

    The main risks for STE include its valuation (its shares are currently trading near 31x forward earnings), a reliance on government spending cycles for parts of the business, and execution risk with large projects. 

    Head-to-Head Comparison

    FactorYangzijiang ShipbuildingST Engineering 
    IndustryShipbuildingAerospace, defence, technology
    Growth driverGlobal shipping demandAviation, defence spending, smart-cities 
    Revenue VisibilityUS$22.4 billion order book (~4 years)S$35.7 billion order book (~3 years)
    Cyclicality HigherLower
    Dividend Yield5.8%1.7%
    Profit MarginsHigh, but cyclicalSteady, expanding
    Balance SheetNet cashSolid with moderate gearing
    Valuation (Forward P/E)8.7x 30.5x 

    The contrast is stark: YZJ is cheaper, higher-yielding and growing faster right now, but its earnings sit at a cyclical high. 

    STE costs three times as much in terms of earnings, but you get diversified, more predictable growth. 

    Which Company Has the Stronger Competitive Advantage?

    YZJ’s advantage is industrial: It has manufacturing scale, decades of know-how, cost competitiveness versus global yards, and sticky relationships with customers such as Seaspan. 

    The shipbuilder’s advantages are pretty solid, but it exists within a cyclical, capital-hungry industry where everyone’s fortunes rise and fall with freight rates.

    STE’s moat lies in its deep engineering expertise, a global blue-chip and government customer base, alongside security clearances and certifications that are hard to replicate. 

    The question for investors is which company has a stronger moat that can endure for decades?

    Valuation: Which Stock Offers Better Value?

    As seen in the comparison table above, YZJ looks like a bargain with its low forward earnings multiple of 8.7x and a hefty yield of 5.8% against STE’s 30.5x and 1.7%, respectively. 

    But cheap and good aren’t the same. YZJ’s single-digit multiple exists because the market expects today’s record margins to fade; you’re buying peak earnings at a low multiple for a deeply cyclical company, which can be a value trap. 

    STE’s premium reflects earnings the market believes will keep compounding regardless. 

    What Type of Investor Might Prefer Each?

    YZJ suits an investor who wants higher growth, exposure to global trade and shipping, while being comfortable timing a cyclical name. 

    STE suits someone looking for something that grows steadily with exposure to aerospace and defence. 

    Or you can always own both names given their genuinely different exposures – one cyclical and trade-driven, the other defensive and steady growth. Owning both can balance a portfolio across different economic climates. 

    Get Smart: Growth Can Come in Different Forms

    YZJ and STE are two very different ways to buy Singapore’s growth: cyclical upside at a striking valuation, but at what looks like a peak; or diversified defensive compounding at a rich price.

    As always, pick the name that most aligns with your investment timeframe, goals, and risk tolerance. 

    If you want to retire with a constant stream of dividends, these 5 stocks might be all you need. We’ve found 5 SG stocks that have kept paying (and growing) through inflation, rate hikes, and recessions. See what they are with our latest free report for SGX dividend investors. Click here to get instant access.

    Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Telegram and YouTube for the latest investing news and analyses!

    Disclosure: Wilson H. does not own shares of any company mentioned.

    Yahoo
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    Related Posts

    Market Volatility

    How to Stay Invested During Market Volatility

    October 16, 2026
    CICT CapitaSpring

    4 Singapore Blue-Chip Stocks I Will Buy with S$40,000

    October 16, 2026
    OCBC (Photo by Rachel)

    If You Invested S$20,000 in OCBC 10 Years Ago, Here’s How Much You Would Have Received in Dividends

    October 16, 2026
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Telegram YouTube TikTok
    • Careers
    • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
    • Advertising & Media Enquiries
    • Subscription Terms of Service
    © 2026 The Smart Investor. All Rights Reserved. The Smart Investor, thesmartinvestor.com.sg, an investment education website managed by The Investing Hustle Pte Ltd (Company Reg No. 201933459Z) is not licensed or otherwise regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and in particular, is not licensed or regulated to carry on business in providing any financial advisory service. Accordingly, any information provided on this site is meant purely for informational and investor educational purposes and should not be relied upon as financial advice. No information is presented with the intention to induce any reader to buy, sell, or hold a particular investment product or class of investment products. Rather, the information is presented for the purpose and intentions of educating readers on matters relating to financial literacy and investor education. Accordingly, any statement of opinion on this site is wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader. The Smart Investor does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any investment product or class of investment products. Readers are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any investment decision, and not rely on any statement of opinion that may be found on this site.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.