Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) stocks have rebounded from their February lows.
But they are far from unscathed.
As of last Friday’s close (20 March 2026), two bellwether SaaS stocks, namely Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) and ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW), are still down by more than 25% since the start of the year.
Meanwhile, accounting SaaS firm Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU) has fallen by 31 per cent.
The culprit?
A narrative dubbed the “SaaSpocalypse” — the belief that agentic AI will render software-as-a-service platforms obsolete.
In February 2026, Anthropic’s launch of Claude Cowork triggered a massive sell-off across the sector.
The fear was that autonomous AI agents, which are capable of handling complex professional tasks from contract reviews to financial analysis, would encroach on the territory of established SaaS platforms.
The panic intensified when Anthropic revealed it had raised US$30 billion in a new funding round, valuing the company at US$380 billion.
The firm’s revenue had skyrocketed from zero to a US$14 billion annualised run rate, growing 10 times for three consecutive years.
It’s a compelling story.
But there’s a difference: while February’s downturn was driven by the fear of the unknown — today, SaaS firms have reported their results and are taking on the market’s fears head-on.
In other words, we have some answers.
Fear #1: Vibe-coding will open the floodgates
The first worry is that AI coding agents will make it trivial to build software, flooding the market with cheaper alternatives to established SaaS platforms.
Here’s the problem with that logic: technology was never the only barrier to SaaS adoption.
Intuit CEO Sasan Goodarzi laid out a useful framework during the company’s latest earnings call.
He drew a line between “context” and “core.”
Core is Intuit’s proprietary data, domain-specific AI models, and human expertise.
Context is where external large language models (LLMs) such as Claude and ChatGPT handle the long tail of industry-specific needs — say, a construction company building custom dashboards within Intuit’s enterprise platform.
Here’s the key insight: Intuit is not competing with LLM providers. It is partnering with them.
And crucially, retaining 100 per cent of the economics.
Veeva Systems (NYSE: VEEV), a SaaS firm focused on the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries, tells a similar story.
CEO Peter Gassner was explicit that LLM providers are infrastructure, not competitors, much as Amazon Web Services (AWS) was to the first generation of cloud software.
Veeva’s AI agents are built using LLMs from Anthropic and Amazon, hosted on Amazon Bedrock.
What makes them valuable isn’t the underlying technology.
Instead, it’s the compliance-grade, domain-specific intelligence layered on top.
ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott put it more bluntly: AI is probabilistic, meaning its results are inherently uncertain.
Enterprise workflow orchestration is deterministic — predictable and governed.
Said another way, AI doesn’t replace enterprise orchestration.
Instead, AI depends on it.
Here’s the telling detail: instead of competing with ServiceNow, Anthropic is partnering with it, helping customers build AI applications on ServiceNow’s platform.
In other words, code is cheap. But trust is not.
Fear #2: SaaS companies will become dumb databases
The second fear is that AI will take over the customer-facing layer, reducing SaaS platforms to basic databases that create, read, update, and delete information.
Nothing more.
Intuit’s recent results suggest the opposite is happening.
Over three million customers have used Intuit’s AI agents, with repeat engagement topping 85 per cent.
Why the high repeat usage?
Here’s a clue: Intuit’s business tax agent is uncovering an average of over US$1,000 in incremental tax deductions per customer.
That’s real savings in their customers’ hands.
It’s no wonder, when AI and human intelligence are offered together, that the customers’ willingness to pay increases significantly.
That’s AI making the platform stickier and more valuable.
What’s more, AI agents are driving higher demand for human assistance, not less.
QuickBooks Live, which offers live support, saw customer growth exceeding 50 per cent in the latest quarter.
Furthermore, these users also show a 22-point higher ecosystem attach rate, meaning they consume more of Intuit’s services across the board.
ServiceNow’s advantage illustrates this further.
Its configuration management database is essentially a detailed blueprint of how each customer’s company operates — who does what, which systems talk to each other, and how tasks flow from start to finish.
These blueprints took years to build and are unique to the needs of each customer.
AI agents can’t figure out how an enterprise works on their own.
They need the maps that incumbents have already built.
In an AI-powered world, the system of record becomes more important, not less.
Fear #3: Seat compression will destroy SaaS economics
The third fear cuts closest to the bone: if AI agents handle most of the work, companies will need fewer human users — and therefore, fewer seats to pay for.
That’s a problem for the SaaS business model which charges by the number of users.
Salesforce’s latest results provide the most direct rebuttal.
The company reported three monetisation paths firing in parallel: upgrading existing customers to premium AI-powered tiers, expanding seat counts (seven of its top 10 deals included new seat additions), and selling consumption-based flex credits for customer-facing agent use cases.
Meanwhile, its main AI product, Agentforce, has grown from zero to US$800 million in annual recurring revenue in 15 months, with over 29,000 deals closed.
ServiceNow’s numbers back this up.
CEO Bill McDermott highlighted an estimated 1.3 billion seats in its addressable market — barely scratched — with its active user base growing 25 per cent year on year in its latest quarter.
Intuit is expanding, too.
The accounting software firm’s mid-market solutions grew approximately 40 per cent year on year.
Furthermore, the company is looking to grow its direct sales team by around 30 per cent, not exactly the behaviour of a business bracing for fewer customers.
Seat compression, for now, remains a theoretical risk rather than a present reality.
Get Smart: Back to basics
So, do the answers above mean that the coast is clear? Not so fast.
The SaaSpocalypse narrative contains a kernel of truth.
AI will still reshape the software industry.
Some SaaS companies will not survive the transition.
But here’s what investors shouldn’t miss.
The way forward requires SaaS companies to return to their roots.
What made SaaS better than legacy licensing models in the first place was a simple but powerful idea: shifting from a transactional relationship to aligning the company’s revenue to the customer’s needs.
You pay for what you use, and the software earns its keep every month.
That alignment hasn’t changed.
If anything, AI will test the relationship again.
The SaaS companies that will thrive are those using AI to solve real customer pain points — uncovering tax deductions, accelerating drug approvals, automating IT workflows — rather than trying to shoehorn the technology into areas where it doesn’t belong.
As the data from ServiceNow, Salesforce, Intuit, and Veeva shows, the best incumbents are already doing exactly that.
The SaaSpocalypse fear is not over.
But real change will likely unfold over years, not weeks.
Big Tech is spending hundreds of billions on AI, and the ripple effects are just beginning. Our new investor guide shows how AI is changing the way companies generate revenue, structure their business models, and gain an edge. Even if you already know the major players, this report reveals something far MORE important: The why and how behind their moves, and what it means for your portfolio. Download your free report now.
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses!
Disclosure: Chin Hui Leong owns shares of Intuit, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Veeva Systems.
