The Smart Investor
    Facebook Instagram
    Thursday, March 23
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    The Smart Investor
    • Home
    • About
      • About Us
      • Careers
    • Smart Investing
      • Getting Started
      • Investing Strategy
      • Smart Analysis
      • Smart Reads
    • Special Free Reports!
    • As Featured on BT
    • Our Services
      • Our Services
      • Subscribe now!
    • Login
    • Cart
    The Smart Investor
    Home»Blue Chips»Better Buy: CapitaLand Versus Frasers Property Limited
    Blue Chips

    Better Buy: CapitaLand Versus Frasers Property Limited

    We compare two property giants to see which offers a more compelling investment proposition for investors.
    Royston YangBy Royston YangJune 22, 20214 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    The pandemic has left a mark on Singapore’s property conglomerates.

    In response, property giants such as CapitaLand Limited (SGX: C31) and Frasers Property Limited (SGX: TQ5), or FPL, have started to reposition themselves for a post-pandemic future.

    With both shares sporting a price-to-book ratio of below one, there could be juicy opportunities for investors. 

    We compare both CapitaLand and FPL on various attributes to see which one stands out against the other.  

    Financials

    First, we looked at the impact of the downturn on both groups’ revenue and net profit.

    To ensure a fair comparison, we used the net profit before fair value changes and exceptional items.

    Impressively, CapitaLand managed to grow its gross revenue by 4.8% year on year to S$6.5 billion despite the tough economic conditions.

    FPL reported a 5.1% year on year decline in revenue to S$3.6 billion.

    For attributable net profit, FPL suffered a steeper fall of 34.5% compared to CapitaLand’s 27.2% year on year decline.

    Winner: CapitaLand

    Assets under management (AUM)

    Next, we take a look at the assets under management for each property giant.

    CapitaLand is the larger of the two with S$132.5 billion worth of assets with almost three-quarters in both China and Singapore.

    FPL has less than half the AUM of CapitaLand at S$42.3 billion with its assets mostly located in Singapore, Australia, Thailand and Vietnam.

    Both property giants have the advantage of being diversified across asset classes such as retail, commercial, industrial and hospitality.

    Winner: CapitaLand

    Debt indicators

    Property developers rely on significant amounts of borrowing to fund their operations.

    Hence, their debt ratios can indicate whether they may be under financial stress or not

    Metrics such as the net debt to total assets and interest coverage ratio are useful in building up a picture of a developer’s financial health.

    From the table above, it’s clear that FPL is more highly geared than CapitaLand, with a higher proportion of net debt compared to both its equity and net assets.

    However, CapitaLand has a higher cost of debt at 3% while its interest coverage ratio remains low at just 0.7 times.

    FPL has a much lower cost of debt at 2.3% and has a better interest cover at three times.

    Winner: FPL

    Dividends and dividend yield

    An income-seeking investor will surely be interested in the dividends aspect of both companies.

    First off, we compared the decrease in dividends as the pandemic as both property businesses had to dip into their coffers to prop tenants up with rental reliefs and rebates.

    CapitaLand is the clear winner here as its dividend fell by just 25% from S$0.12 to S$0.09.

    FPL, however, saw a steep 75% year on year plunge in annual dividends as it declared a S$0.015 dividend, down from the S$0.06 declared a year ago. The company also suspended its interim dividend in light of economic conditions.

    Because of the decline in dividends, FPL’s dividend yield has also fallen below that of CapitaLand’s, at 1.3% versus 2.4%.

    Winner: CapitaLand

    Corporate developments make a difference

    Aside from purely looking at numbers and financial metrics, it’s also useful to study recent corporate developments for each company.

    FPL conducted a rights issue back in February this year on the basis of 37 rights shares for every 100 shares owned at an issue price of S$1.18 per share.

    The rationale for this corporate exercise was to “enhance business resilience” and strengthen the group’s balance sheet.

    Without using the proceeds for any major acquisitions, this move will surely dilute FPL’s already weakened earnings per share even further.

    CapitaLand, on the other hand, announced a major restructuring where it will spin off its investment management arm and privatise its development arm.

    The restructuring is set to unlock value for shareholders once approved in the third quarter of 2021.

    Get Smart: CapitaLand seems more appealing

    From the above, it seems CapitaLand provides a more compelling option.

    Not only does the company have a larger asset base, but it also managed to grow its revenue and did not drop its dividend drastically.

    Furthermore, investors can look forward to the impending spin-off of its investment arm under CapitaLand Investment Management or CLIM.

    Once CLIM is listed on the stock exchange, it may offer a more attractive investment proposition for investors.

    Can’t decide between growth or income? Now, you can enjoy the best of both worlds with our newest FREE report, 8 Singapore Stocks for Your Retirement Portfolio. You’ll discover 8 SGX stocks we believe can offer you strong capital growth and juicy dividend payouts. Click here to download the report.

    Follow us on Facebook and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses!

    Disclaimer: Royston Yang does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned.

    Yahoo
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    Related Posts

    Aircraft Engine on Runway

    Can ST Engineering’s Dividend Increase After Clinching a S$430-Million Contract?

    March 22, 2023
    Forklift in Warehouse

    5 Singapore REITs That May Comfortably Weather Higher Interest Rates in 2023

    March 22, 2023
    Person Putting on Rubber Gloves

    Top Glove Surged 21.4% in the Past Week: Are the Glovemaker’s Troubles Over?

    March 21, 2023
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Telegram
    • Careers
    • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
    • Subscription Terms of Service
    © 2023 The Smart Investor. All Rights Reserved. The Smart Investor, thesmartinvestor.com.sg, an investment education website managed by The Investing Hustle Pte Ltd (Company Reg No. 201933459Z) is not licensed or otherwise regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and in particular, is not licensed or regulated to carry on business in providing any financial advisory service. Accordingly, any information provided on this site is meant purely for informational and investor educational purposes and should not be relied upon as financial advice. No information is presented with the intention to induce any reader to buy, sell, or hold a particular investment product or class of investment products. Rather, the information is presented for the purpose and intentions of educating readers on matters relating to financial literacy and investor education. Accordingly, any statement of opinion on this site is wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader. The Smart Investor does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any investment product or class of investment products. Readers are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any investment decision, and not rely on any statement of opinion that may be found on this site.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.