The Smart Investor
    Facebook Instagram
    Saturday, October 3
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    The Smart Investor
    • Home
    • About
      • About Us
      • Careers
    • Smart Investing
      • Getting Started
      • Investing Strategy
      • Smart Analysis
      • Smart Reads
    • US Stocks
    • Special Free Reports!
    • As Featured on BT
    • Our Services
      • Our Services
      • Subscribe now!
    • Login
    • Cart
    The Smart Investor
    Home»Growth Stocks»Pain Before Gain
    Growth Stocks

    Pain Before Gain

    Even when you’ve found the best company to invest in, it’s likely that there will be pain before gain; don’t give up on the company’s stock just because its price has fallen
    Chong Ser JingBy Chong Ser JingFebruary 27, 20234 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    In my December 2021 article, The Need For Patience, I shared two of my favourite investing stories. The first involved Warren Buffett’s experience with investing in The Washington Post Company in 1973 and the second was about the recommendation of Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) shares by the brothers, David and Tom Gardner, during a TV show in the USA in July 1998. 

    The thread tying the two stories together was that both companies saw sharp declines in their stock prices while on their way to delivering massive returns. Washington Post’s stock price fell by more than 20% shortly after Buffett invested, and then stayed in the red for three years. But by the end of 2007, Buffett’s investment in Washington Post had produced a return of more than 10,000%. As for Starbucks, its stock price was down by a third a mere six weeks after the Gardners’ recommendation. When The Need For Patience was published, the global coffee retailer’s stock price was 30 times higher from where the Gardners recommended the company.

    I recently learnt that Walmart (NYSE: WMT), the US retail giant, had walked a similar path. From 1971 to 1980, Walmart produced breath-taking business growth. The table below shows the near 30x increase in Walmart’s revenue and the 1,600% jump in earnings per share in that period. Unfortunately, this exceptional growth did not help with Walmart’s short-term return. Based on the earliest data I could find, Walmart’s stock price fell by three-quarters from less than US$0.04 in late-August 1972 to around US$0.01 by December 1974 – in comparison, the S&P 500 was down by ‘only’ 40%. 

    Source: Walmart annual reports

    But by the end of 1979, Walmart’s stock price was above US$0.08, more than double what it was in late-August 1972. Still, the 2x-plus increase in Walmart’s stock price was far below the huge increase in earnings per share the company generated. This is where the passage of time helped – as more years passed, the weighing machine clicked into gear (I’m borrowing from Ben Graham’s brilliant analogy of the stock market being a voting machine in the short run but a weighing machine in the long run). At the end of 1989, Walmart’s stock price was around US$3.70, representing an annualised growth rate in the region of 32% from August 1972; from 1971 to 1989, Walmart’s revenue and earnings per share grew by 41% and 38% per year. Even by the end of 1982, Walmart’s stock price was already US$0.48, up more than 10 times where it was in late-August 1972. 

    What’s also interesting was Walmart’s valuation. It turns out that in late-August 1972, when its stock price was less than US$0.04, Walmart’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was between 42 and 68 (I couldn’t find quarterly financial data for Walmart for that time period so I worked only with annual data). This is a high valuation. If you looked at Walmart’s stock price in December 1974, after it had sunk by 75% to a low of around US$0.01 to carry a P/E ratio of between 6 and 7, the easy conclusion is that it was a mistake to invest in Walmart in August 1972 because of its high valuation. But as Walmart’s business continued to grow, its stock price eventually soared to around US$3.70 near the end of 1989. What looked like a horrendous mistake in the short run turned out to be a wonderful decision in the long run because of Walmart’s underlying business growth. 

    This look at a particular part of Walmart’s history brings to mind two important lessons for all of us when we’re investing in stocks:

    • Even when you’ve found the best company to invest in, it’s likely that there will be pain before gain; don’t give up on the company’s stock just because its price has fallen
    • Paying a high valuation can still work out really well if the company’s underlying business can indeed grow at a high clip for a long time 

    Note: An earlier version of this article was published at The Good Investors, a personal blog run by our friends.

    How do you decide if a growth stock is worth your money? There is no shortage of stock ideas today, but is a particular stock suitable for you? Find out more in our latest FREE report, How To Find The Best US Growth Stocks For Your Portfolio. Click HERE to download the report for free now! 

    Follow us on Facebook and Telegram for the latest investing news and analyses!

    Disclosure: Ser Jing owns shares of Starbucks.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    Related Posts

    Top Stock Market Highlights of the Week: City Developments, Stoneweg Europe Stapled Trust, MAS, DFI Retail and Anthropic

    October 3, 2026
    Smart Thought Of The Week

    Smart Thought Of The Week: Reality

    October 2, 2026
    Bargain or trap?

    Bargain or Trap? 3 Worst-Performing SGX Blue Chips in Q3 2026

    October 2, 2026
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Telegram YouTube TikTok
    • Careers
    • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
    • Advertising & Media Enquiries
    • Subscription Terms of Service
    © 2026 The Smart Investor. All Rights Reserved. The Smart Investor, thesmartinvestor.com.sg, an investment education website managed by The Investing Hustle Pte Ltd (Company Reg No. 201933459Z) is not licensed or otherwise regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and in particular, is not licensed or regulated to carry on business in providing any financial advisory service. Accordingly, any information provided on this site is meant purely for informational and investor educational purposes and should not be relied upon as financial advice. No information is presented with the intention to induce any reader to buy, sell, or hold a particular investment product or class of investment products. Rather, the information is presented for the purpose and intentions of educating readers on matters relating to financial literacy and investor education. Accordingly, any statement of opinion on this site is wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader. The Smart Investor does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any investment product or class of investment products. Readers are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any investment decision, and not rely on any statement of opinion that may be found on this site.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.